Skip to main content
. 2020 May 15;10:8082. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65074-1

Table 4.

Working hypotheses and variables used to explain P. unifilis nest removal by humans in the eastern Brazilian Amazon.

Category Working hypothesis Variable name Variable description Variable supporta
Environmental Nesting area type could influence the access of predators affecting nest removal Type Categorical – located along the river bank or island
Environmental Nest density could influence the success of predators finding nests and affect nest removal Nest density Continuous – Number of turtle nests per nesting area (m2)
Environmental Nest distance to water could influence the detectability of the nest, affecting nest removal Distance to water Continuous – Distance (m) from turtle nests to the nearest water source +
Environmental Different substrate types can affect nest detectability, and nest removal PC1 scores Continuous – Principal Component axis 1 scores from proportions of substrate grain sizes ++
Anthropogenic Since Araguari river has higher anthropogenic pressure, different rivers will present differences in nest site selection and nest removal River Categorical – River segment (Falsino or Araguari) ++
Anthropogenic Closer to houses human disturbances will increase, affecting nest site selection and nest removal Distance to house Continuous – Distance (km) to nearest riverine house
Spatial Nests spatial distribution will affect nest removal Long, Lat Continuous – Coordinates (decimal degrees) of nests
Spatial Nests located in the same nest site are more likely to have similar removal rates Nesting site ID Categorical – Nest site identification ++

aStrength of variable support from our information theoretic analysis. Unsupported = “−”, weakly supported “+”, and strongly supported = “++”.