Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;104(11):4781–4794. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10585-0

Table 2.

Summary of TAms discovered using metagenomic approaches

Enzyme (S)/(R) Comments Reference
Sequence-driven approach
  pQR1108–pQR1118 (S) Metagenome derived from oral cavities of humans Baud et al. (2017)
  Is3-TA (S) Metagenome derived from hot spring metagenomes in Italy and Iceland Ferrandi et al. (2017)
  It6-TA (S)
  B3-TA (S)
  pQR2188–pQR2191 (S) Metagenome derived from DNA isolated from domestic drain Leipold et al. (2019)
  pQR2193 (S)
  pQR2200–pQR2202 (S)
  pQR2204–pQR2209 (S)
  pQR2211 (S)
  pQR2213–pQR2213 (S)
  KMG-TAm4 (S) Metagenome derived from Triassic period salt mine Kelly et al. (2018a, b)
Functional metagenomics
  pRT15-TA (S)

Fosmid library generated for screening

Sequence 15% shorter than Vf-TAm and Cv-TAm

Pawar et al. (2018)
  TR1 to TR10 (S)a Fosmid library Coscolín et al. (2019)
Metagenomic derived from 28 geographically distinct environments, including chronically polluted marine sediment samples, an acidic beach pool and the genome of Pseudomonas oleovorans

aEnzymes TR2, TR6, TR9, and TR10 accepted both enantiomers of 2-aminononane