Table 3.

One-sided signed-rank significance values for the probability splitter vs. place and non-place cells stay active, event-rate matched (n = session pairs).

Day lag (n)	1 (58)	2 (34)	3 (24)	4 (25)	5 (30)	6 (41)	7 (44)	8 (31)
vs. Arm PCs	0.56	0.12	0.98	0.98	0.86	0.20	0.31	0.33
vs. Stem PCs	0.47	0.68	0.95	0.68	0.82	0.40	0.97	0.95
vs. Arm NPCs	7.9e−7	0.0011	0.0083	0.065	0.073	0.014	0.0022	0.0090
vs. Stem NPCs	0.0040	0.0030	0.024	0.37	0.25	0.049	0.0010	0.062
Day lag (n)	9 (21)	10 (10)	11 (10)	12 (14)	13 (22)	14 (17)	15 (13)
vs. Arm PCs	0.13	0.35	0.65	0.57	0.26	0.20	0.07
vs. Stem PCs	0.83	0.82	0.92	0.93	0.90	0.65	0.71
vs. Arm NPCs	0.016	0.60	0.27	0.027	0.46	0.23	0.0017
vs. Stem NPCs	0.034	0.63	0.71	0.27	0.11	0.27	0.034

Neurons with the lowest event-rate were removed from each session such that the mean event rate of each coding type matched that of splitter neurons.