Table 2.
The Consensus Results of Three Subsampled E. coli K-12 R9 Datasets
| Dataset | Pipeline | # Contigs | Total Bases (bp) | Identity (%) | Time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training set (54×) | miniasm + CONNET(2) | 1 | 4,619,544 | 99.817 | 26 |
| Training set (54×) | miniasm + Racon(4) | 1 | 4,636,480 | 99.498 | 42 |
| Training set (54×) | wtdbg2(2) | 1 | 4,612,292 | 99.403 | 23 |
| Training set (54×) | Canu | 6 | 4,690,706 | 99.523 | 541 |
| Testing set #1 (60×) | miniasm + CONNET(2) | 1 | 4,625,887 | 99.814 | 31 |
| Testing set #1 (60×) | miniasm + Racon(4) | 1 | 4,627,221 | 99.617 | 48 |
| Testing set #1 (60×) | wtdbg2(2) | 1 | 4,613,955 | 99.487 | 25 |
| Testing set #1 (60×) | Canu | 3 | 4,645,786 | 99.586 | 490 |
| Testing set #2 (60×) | miniasm + CONNET(2) | 3 | 4,657,298 | 99.797 | 30 |
| Testing set #2 (60×) | miniasm + Racon(4) | 3 | 4,663,034 | 99.593 | 46 |
| Testing set #2 (60×) | wtdbg2(2) | 1 | 4,612,282 | 99.473 | 24 |
| Testing set #2 (60×) | Canu | 3 | 4,659,585 | 99.577 | 469 |