Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 7;26:102163. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102163

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

(A) Group comparison on temporal variability. (B-C) Group comparisons on the temporal correlation coefficient and characteristic temporal path length, with values at each sparsity level and average values across all sparsities (10% to 50%) both presented. (D) Partial correlations between each metric and the HAMD score, adjusted for age, sex and site effects. The error bars and shadows in (A)–(C) represent 95% confidence intervals, and all reported p values were corrected for multiple tests using the FDR method.