Skip to main content
. 2020 May 6;2020:8496527. doi: 10.1155/2020/8496527

Table 2.

Multiple regression analysis examining the association between sample characteristics and pain disability (n = 111).

Men, n = 61 Women, n = 50
Dependent = PDAS β (95% CI) β (95% CI)
(R2 = 0.44, Fchange 5.8) (R2 = 0.44, Fchange 4.1)
Age 0.01 (−0.20–0.23) 0.31 (0.06–0.55)
BMI −0.04 (−0.26–0.18) −0.14 (−0.41–0.12)
Pain duration 0.03 (−0.19–0.25) −0.16 (−0.43–0.10)
NRS maximum 0.20 (−0.03–0.43) 0.40 (0.14–0.67)∗∗∗
PCS 0.18 (−0.08–0.44) 0.21 (−0.13–0.56)
HADS anxiety −0.01 (−0.39–0.38) 0.08 (−0.34–0.49)
HADS depression 0.14 (−0.22–0.51) −0.10 (−0.48–0.28)
AIS 0.36 (0.09–0.63) 0.13 (−0.20–0.45)

Multiple regression analysis was performed: p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. PDAS: Pain Disability Assessment Scale, BMI: body mass index, NRS: Numerical Rating Scale, PCS: Pain Catastrophizing Score, HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, AIS: Athens Insomnia Scale, β: standardized regression coefficient, and CI: confidence interval.