Skip to main content
. 2020 May 15;25:14. doi: 10.1186/s12199-020-00851-y

Table 3.

Logistic regression analyses describing the associations between ICS adoption and possible predictor variables in Northwest Ethiopia, May 2018 (n = 5830)

Characteristics ICS adoption CORa (95% CI) AORb (95% CI)
No Yes
Gender of the household head Female 287 137 3.95 (3.17, 4.93) 1.96 (1.24, 3.10)*
Male 4823 583 1
Educational level of the household head Do not read/write 3319 264 0.14 (0.11, 0.17) 0.31 (0.23, 0.42)*
Read/write only 758 85 0.19 (0.14, 0.26) 0.41 (0.29, 0.58)*
Primary school 513 111 0.37 (0.28, 0.50) 0.50 (0.35, 0.69)*
Secondary school 270 115 0.73 (0.54, 0.99) 0.94 (0.67, 0.1.33)
Higher education 250 145 1
Family size of the household 2–3 972 186 1.80 (1.37, 2.37) 0.73 (0.53, 1.01)
4–5 1745 280 1.51 (1.16, 1.95) 0.95 (0.70, 1.27)
6–7 1613 171 1.00 (0.76, 1.31) 0.93 (0.68, 1.26 )
8 or more individuals 780 83 1
House ownership Private/own 4544 650 1.16 (0.89, 1.50) 4.58 (3.89, 6.19)*
Rented 566 70 1
Location of cooking quarter Separate kitchen 3106 579 2.65 (2.19, 3.21) 1.84 (1.49, 2.78)*
Inside living house 2004 141 1
Source of fuel Purchasing 1070 346 4.23 (3.48, 5.14) 2.13 (1.64, 2.76)*
Purchasing and collecting 1727 197 1.49 (1.21, 1.84) 1.37 (1.08, 1.75)*
Collecting 2313 177 1
Fuel processing requirement Yes 1379 120 0.54 (0.44, 0.67) 0.55 (0.44, 0.70)*
No 3731 600 1
Durability of cookstove More durable 2203 448 2.19 (1.71, 2.80) 1.71(1.30, 2.26)*
Comparable 2004 188 1.01 (0.77, 1.32) 1.22 (0.91, 1.64)
Less durable 903 84 1
Fuel-saving benefit of cookstove Important 2903 546 2.70 (2.01, 3.62) 1.63 (1.18, 2.24)*
Neutral 1447 121 1.20 (0.86, 1.68) 1.38 (0.96, 1.98)
Less important 760 53 1
Health benefit of cookstove Important 378 180 4.43 (3.52, 5.57) 1.76 (1.15, 2.70)*
Neutral 2826 335 1.10 (0.92, 1.32) 0.98 (0.80, 1.19)
Less important 1906 205 1
Time-saving benefit of cookstove Important 1842 376 2.24 (1.80, 2.79) 1.19 (0.93, 1.54)
Neutral 1983 227 1.26 (1.00, 1.59) 0.89 (0.69, 1.16)
Less important 1285 117 1
Safety benefit of ICS Important 2320 348 1.03 (0.81, 1.29) 1.13 (0.87, 1.48)
Neutral 2058 265 0.88 (0.69, 1.12) 1.06 (0.81, 1.38)
Less important 732 107 1
Optimistic previous social interaction Yes 3349 585 2.28 (1.87, 2.77) 1.81 (1.46, 2.26)*
No 1761 135 1
Traditional suitability of cookstove Yes 760 189 2.04 (1.70, 2.45) 1.58 (1.28, 1.95)*
No 4350 531 1
Live demonstration experience Yes 3024 592 3.19 (2.62, 3.89) 2.47 (1.98, 3.07)*
No 2086 128 1
Price of cookstove Cheap 461 142 2.50 (2.01, 3.13) 2.48 (1.91, 3.21)*
Medium 2161 272 1.02 (0.86, 1.22) 1.00 (0.82, 1.21)
Expensive 2488 306 1
Availability of cookstove Yes 2226 468 2.41 (2.05, 2.83) 1.81 (1.51, 2.17)*
No 2884 252 1

*Significantly associated

CORa and AORb were obtained by taking the exponentials of the beta coefficients (i.e., Exp(ß) = odds ratio) together with their corresponding 95% CIs from our univariate and multivariable logistic regression model analysis outputs respectively using SPSS for Windows version 22 to describe the associations between ICS adoption and the possible predictor variables. The AORs (95% CIs) were obtained from one logistic regression analysis model including an outcome variable of ICS adoption and all independent variables simultaneously