Table 4.

Deaths averted by each intervention strategy and region (compared to deaths without intervention) between May 5, 2020 and December 31, 2020.

Intervention strategya	Metropolitana	Araucanía	Ñuble
Strategy 1: School closures, telework	7,612–20,725 (7.1–16.5%)	1,019–2,707 (7.4–16.5%)	518–1,288 (7.1–15.1%)
Strategy 2: Case isolation, home quarantine, social distancing>70, telework	39,006–79,233 (36.6–63.2%)	4,885–12,622 (35.2–77.1%)	2,018–6,742 (27.8–79.1%)
Strategy 3: Lockdownb	106,381–125,140 (99.8–99.8%)	13,855–16,372 (99.9–99.9%)	7,706–8,274 (99.9–99.9%)

^aImplemented per scenarios in Table 3 and assumptions in Table 1, Table 2.

^bValues shown are based on deaths during the lockdown period only due to its short duration and the subsequent rise in deaths when lockdown ends (Figure 1).