Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 3;4(2):616–629. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa039

Table 12.

Effects of increasing LL in finishing pig diets on growth performancea,b

Contrast P-valuec
Item Control 2.5 LLd 5 LLe 7.5 LLf SEM Linear Quadratic
BW, kg
 d 0 53.9 53.8 53.9 54.2 1.04 0.831 0.817
 d 53 120.0 118.5 120.0 118.7 2.031 0.697 0.958
d 0–53
 ADG, kg 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.21 0.029 0.852 0.517
 ADFI, kg 3.31 3.18 3.26 3.27 0.104 0.694 0.231
 G: F 0.367 0.385 0.379 0.372 0.011 0.791 0.070

aA total of 289 finishing pigs (DNA 241 × 600; initially 54 kg) were used with 6 replicate pens per treatment and 8 to 14 pigs per pen. Research was conducted at Texas A&M University, O.D. Butler Animal Science Teaching and Research Center, Nutrition and Physiology Center (College Station, TX).

bThree phases of experimental diets were fed from d 0 to 19, d 19 to 36 and d 36 to 53 for Phases 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

cResults from experiment were considered significant at P < 0.05 and a marginal significance between P > 0.05 and P ≤ 0.10.

d–fPhases contain increasing amounts of LL (SweetLac 63; Westway Feed Products, Tomball, TX).