Table 12.
Effects of increasing LL in finishing pig diets on growth performancea,b
| Contrast P-valuec | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Control | 2.5 LLd | 5 LLe | 7.5 LLf | SEM | Linear | Quadratic |
| BW, kg | |||||||
| d 0 | 53.9 | 53.8 | 53.9 | 54.2 | 1.04 | 0.831 | 0.817 |
| d 53 | 120.0 | 118.5 | 120.0 | 118.7 | 2.031 | 0.697 | 0.958 |
| d 0–53 | |||||||
| ADG, kg | 1.21 | 1.22 | 1.23 | 1.21 | 0.029 | 0.852 | 0.517 |
| ADFI, kg | 3.31 | 3.18 | 3.26 | 3.27 | 0.104 | 0.694 | 0.231 |
| G: F | 0.367 | 0.385 | 0.379 | 0.372 | 0.011 | 0.791 | 0.070 |
aA total of 289 finishing pigs (DNA 241 × 600; initially 54 kg) were used with 6 replicate pens per treatment and 8 to 14 pigs per pen. Research was conducted at Texas A&M University, O.D. Butler Animal Science Teaching and Research Center, Nutrition and Physiology Center (College Station, TX).
bThree phases of experimental diets were fed from d 0 to 19, d 19 to 36 and d 36 to 53 for Phases 1, 2 and 3, respectively.
cResults from experiment were considered significant at P < 0.05 and a marginal significance between P > 0.05 and P ≤ 0.10.
d–fPhases contain increasing amounts of LL (SweetLac 63; Westway Feed Products, Tomball, TX).