Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nutrition. 2020 Jan 18;74:110733. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110733

Table 3.

Percent body fat estimated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, body adiposity index and five bioelectrical impedance analysis predictive equations with equivalence and concordance between measures in adult, healthy African born blacks (N=266).

Percent Body Fat
(mean ± SD)
Equivalence# with DXA
(90% Confidence
Interval)
Concordance* with DXA
(Tau coefficient)
Men
(n=181)
Women
(n=85)
Men
(n=181)
Women
(n=85)
Men
(n=181)
Women
(n=85)
DXAa 27.2 ± 5.5 40.3 ± 6.9
BAIb 25.3 ± 3.5 33.8 ± 5.6 (−2.5, −1.3) (−7.4, −5.6) 0.362 0.515
BIASunc 28.1 ± 5.0 41.2 ± 6.7 (0.5, 1.4) (0.2, 1.6) 0.506 0.633
BIANHANES III 29.5 ± 5.1 41.4 ± 6.6 (1.9, 2.8) (0.4, 2.0) 0.517 0.603
BIALuke 36.6 ± 5.7 46.1 ± 6.8 (9.0, 9.9) (5.1, 6.6) 0.502 0.645
BIAZillikens 28.2 ± 6.2 38.9 ± 8.4 (0.6, 1.5) (−2.2, −0.6) 0.592 0.696
BIAMETS 28.9 ± 5.1 41.3 ± 5.6 (1.2, 2.2) (0.3, 1.7) 0.537 0.617
a

DXA=dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

b

BAI=body adiposity index

c

BIA=bioelectrical impedance analysis

#

The zone of scientific or clinical significance was considered (±3)

*

Kendall’s Tau Correlation Coefficients, all p < 0.0001