Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2020 Jun;161(6):1227–1236. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001826

Table 3: Comparative relationships between psychosocial factors, QST findings and clinical self-report of pelvic pain.

Spearman correlation coefficients are shown for factors and pain self-report. Analysis was limited to healthy control, dysmenorrhea and dysmenorrhea with bladder pain sensitivity participants, to avoid long-term effects of bladder pain syndrome. BOLD - significant correlations (p < 0.05) after corrections for multiple comparisons. QST: Quantitative Sensory Testing, PPT: Pain Pressure Threshold.

Menstrual
Pain
Pelvic
Pain
Urination
Pain
Bowel
Pain
Sex
Pain
General
Pain
Covariates
Anxiety 0.11 0.21 0.14 0.31 0.07 0.22
Depression −0.02 0.17 0.14 0.28 −0.03 0.24
Catastrophizing 0.24 0.25 0.16 0.22 −0.05 0.11
QST
Provoked Bladder Pain 0.26 0.44 0.57 0.45 0.39 0.36
Body PPT −0.18 −0.20 −0.13 −0.26 0.01 −0.09
Pelvic PPT −0.19 −0.12 −0.10 −0.27 −0.07 −0.11
Afterpain 0.14 0.14 0.19 0.33 0.31 0.13
Cold 0.23 0.15 0.12 0.17 −0.01 0.04
Temporal Summation −0.10 0.01 −0.02 −0.05 −0.04 −0.03
Conditioned Pain Modulation −0.11 −0.23 −0.17 −0.08 −0.14 −0.13