Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2019 Sep 10;133(Pt A):105122. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105122

Table 5.

Specific bacterial taxa associated with level of urinary Pb concentration, adjusted for covariates.

Uncorrected P-value Direction

Two-part Zero-part Positive-part

Phylum
Proteobacteria 0.0236 0.0006* 0.9620
Class
Alphaproteobacteria 0.6436 0.0198 0.6436
Betaproteobacteria 0.5050 0.0099 0.5050
Deltaproteobacteria 0.0119 0.0119 1.0000
Gammaproteobacteria 0.0317 0.7030 0.0307
Order
Burkholderiales 0.0044 0.0002* 0.7822
Clostridiales 0.0008 0.1582 0.0008
Desulfovibrionales 0.0921 0.0277 0.8208
Rhizobiales 0.1683 0.0099 0.1683
Family
Alcaligenaceae 0.4356 0.0099 0.4356
Barnesiellaceae 0.2574 0.0495 0.2574
Brucellaceae 0.0248 0.0248 1.0000
Clostridiaceae 0.0218 0.0406 0.1416
Desulfovibrionaceae 0.0644 0.0178 0.4772
Enterococcaceae 0.0129 0.9307 0.0129
Lactobacillaceae 0.1881 0.0396 0.5446
Oxalobacteraceae 0.3267 0.0495 0.3267
Rikenellaceae 0.0584 0.0208 1.0000
Genus
Clostridium 0.0455 0.7406 0.0455
Coprococcus 0.0238 0.0099 0.3178
Desulfovibrio 0.8119 0.0396 0.8119
Eubacterium 0.0149 0.0525 0.0663
Pediococcus 0.0124 0.0124 1.0000
Ruminococcus 0.0208 0.0614 0.0347

Data come from the microbiome study sample of the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin 2016–2017.

Analysis was performed using Quasi Conditional Association Test using Generalized Estimating Equations (QCAT-GEE), adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, antibiotic use, race/ethnicity, education, smoking, fiber consumption, urbanicity, and indoor pets.

*

Indicates p < 0.05 after FDR correction.