Table 3.
Sample statistics on acceptance of novel food, innovative technologies for food preparation and other factors affecting the willingness to taste insect-based food.
Criterion | Scale of Measurement | Frequency (%) |
---|---|---|
Type of insect-based food | 1 = I am not willing to eat insect-based food in any form or preparation | 22.9% |
2 = I am willing to eat meat, fish, eggs or milk made from animals raised with insect-based feed | 50.6% | |
3 = I am willing to eat protein food supplements based on insect flour | 7.4% | |
4 = I am willing to eat cookies made from wheat and insect flour | 16.8% | |
5 = I am willing to eat cookies with visible insects | 2.3% | |
Novel food acceptance | 1 = I do not trust novel food, not even if I know what it contains | 7.8% |
2 = I sometimes taste novel food, but only if I am well informed about its characteristics | 37.7% | |
3 = I am glad to taste novel food if its appearance and smell are attractive | 44.5% | |
4 = I am always looking for novel and different food, I taste everything | 10% | |
Innovative technologies acceptance | 1 = The innovative technologies for food preparation are useless and can be harmful | 9% |
2 = There is plenty tasty and nourishing food available on the market, so there is no need to use innovative technologies to produce more food | 23% | |
3 = The benefits of innovative food technologies are often overrated and can reduce the natural quality of food | 21.9% | |
4 = The innovative technologies can be fundamental to produce nourishing and sustainable food | 46.1% | |
Presence of a food safety certification | 1 = No, I would not taste anyway | 26.5% |
2 = It would not change so much | 30.6% | |
3 = Yes, I would taste | 42.9% | |
Participation to a tasting session leaded by a well-known chef | 1 = No, I would not taste anyway | 35.2% |
2 = It would not change so much | 41.6% | |
3 = Yes, I would taste | 23.2% |