Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 27;9(4):387. doi: 10.3390/foods9040387

Table 3.

Sample statistics on acceptance of novel food, innovative technologies for food preparation and other factors affecting the willingness to taste insect-based food.

Criterion Scale of Measurement Frequency (%)
Type of insect-based food 1 = I am not willing to eat insect-based food in any form or preparation 22.9%
2 = I am willing to eat meat, fish, eggs or milk made from animals raised with insect-based feed 50.6%
3 = I am willing to eat protein food supplements based on insect flour 7.4%
4 = I am willing to eat cookies made from wheat and insect flour 16.8%
5 = I am willing to eat cookies with visible insects 2.3%
Novel food acceptance 1 = I do not trust novel food, not even if I know what it contains 7.8%
2 = I sometimes taste novel food, but only if I am well informed about its characteristics 37.7%
3 = I am glad to taste novel food if its appearance and smell are attractive 44.5%
4 = I am always looking for novel and different food, I taste everything 10%
Innovative technologies acceptance 1 = The innovative technologies for food preparation are useless and can be harmful 9%
2 = There is plenty tasty and nourishing food available on the market, so there is no need to use innovative technologies to produce more food 23%
3 = The benefits of innovative food technologies are often overrated and can reduce the natural quality of food 21.9%
4 = The innovative technologies can be fundamental to produce nourishing and sustainable food 46.1%
Presence of a food safety certification 1 = No, I would not taste anyway 26.5%
2 = It would not change so much 30.6%
3 = Yes, I would taste 42.9%
Participation to a tasting session leaded by a well-known chef 1 = No, I would not taste anyway 35.2%
2 = It would not change so much 41.6%
3 = Yes, I would taste 23.2%