Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;61(2):82–92. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.82

Table 4.

The analysis of overall interaction effects of age and gender, followed by effects on specific CRD tests’ outcomes*

Wilks’ λ F P partial η2
CRD11
0.981
12.175
<0.001
0.019
MinT
0.300
0.584
<0.001
MedT
3.858
0.050
0.001
TTST
16.783
<0.001
0.005
NErr
16.130
<0.001
0.005
SB
16.220
<0.001
0.005
EB
44.370
<0.001
0.014
TB
32.955
<0.001
0.010
CRD311
0.999
0.676
0.609
<0.001
MinT
1.069
0.301
<0.001
MedT
2.067
0.151
<0.001
TTST
2.091
0.148
<0.001
SB
0.749
0.387
<0.001
EB
0.449
0.503
<0.001
TB
0.774
0.379
<0.001
CRD411
0.963 23.828
<0.001
0.037
MinT
25.294
<0.001
0.008
MedT
62.972
<0.001
0.0201
TTST
83.003
<0.001
0.026
NErr
1.241
0.265
<0.001
SB
82.419
<0.001
0.026
EB
57.526
<0.001
0.018
TB 80.457 <0.001 0.026

*MinT – the best (shortest) single-task solving time, MedT – median time to solve task, TTST – total test solving time, NErr – total number of errors on the test, SB – start ballast, EB – end ballast, TB – total ballast.

†MANCOVA performed including MinT, MedT, TTST, NErr, SB, EB, TB as dependent variables, testing the interaction effects of age and gender, followed by specific CRD outcomes interaction effects.