Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;12(4):1099. doi: 10.3390/nu12041099

Table 3.

Risk of ≥20% eGFR decline according to baseline eGFR-based dietary pattern score.

Women Quartiles of Dietary Pattern Score OR (95% CI) Continuous Dietary Pattern Score
1 2 3 4 P for Trend OR (95% CI) P
Cases/population 1316/11,438 1286/11,436 1215/11,436 1155/11,436 4972/45,746
eGFR decline ≥20% (%) 11.5 11.2 10.6 10.1 <0.001 10.9
Model 1 1.00 0.97 (0.90–1.06) 0.91 (0.84–0.99) 0.86 (0.79–0.94) <0.001 0.93 (0.90–0.97) <0.001
Model 2 1.00 0.97 (0.90–1.06) 0.91 (0.84–0.99) 0.86 (0.79–0.94) <0.001 0.93 (0.90–0.97) <0.001
Model 3 1.00 0.95 (0.88–1.04) 0.88 (0.81–0.96) 0.83 (0.76–0.91) <0.001 0.92 (0.88–0.95) <0.001
Model 4 1.00 0.95 (0.88–1.03) 0.88 (0.81–0.96) 0.83 (0.76–0.91) <0.001 0.92 (0.88–0.95) <0.001
Model 5 1.00 0.93 (0.86–1.02) 0.86 (0.79–0.94) 0.79 (0.73–0.87) <0.001 0.90 (0.86–0.93) <0.001
Men Quartiles of Dietary Pattern Score OR (95% CI) Continuous Dietary Pattern Score
1 2 3 4 P for Trend OR (95% CI) P
Cases/population 756/8147 660/8148 648/8147 574/8147 2638/32,589
eGFR decline ≥20% (%) 9.3 8.1 8.0 7.0 <0.001 8.1
Model 1 1.00 0.85 (0.76–0.94) 0.82 (0.73–0.92) 0.71 (0.64–0.80) <0.001 0.87 (0.83–0.92) <0.001
Model 2 1.00 0.85 (0.76–0.95) 0.81 (0.73–0.91) 0.70 (0.63–0.79) <0.001 0.86 (0.82–0.91) <0.001
Model 3 1.00 0.84 (0.75–0.94) 0.80 (0.72–0.90) 0.68 (0.60–0.77) <0.001 0.85 (0.80–0.90) <0.001
Model 4 1.00 0.84 (0.76–0.94) 0.80 (0.72–0.90) 0.68 (0.60–0.77) <0.001 0.85 (0.80–0.90) <0.001
Model 5 1.00 0.84 (0.75–0.94) 0.80 (0.71–0.89) 0.67 (0.59–0.76) <0.001 0.85 (0.80–0.90) <0.001

Model 1. Adjusted for age and body surface area (BSA); Model 2. Model 1 plus body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, cholesterol, triglycerides, diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease; Model 3. Model 2 plus physical activity, smoker, and total energy intake; Model 4. Model 3 plus education and income; Model 5. Model 4 plus baseline eGFR.