Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;11(4):415. doi: 10.3390/genes11040415

Table 4.

List of genes differentially expressed because of the flushing diet in Finnsheep (FS), Texel (TX) and F1 crosses (F1). Gene IDs lacking gene name and/or descriptions (marked with an *) were checked again in the NCBI to retrieve additional information.

Gene Gene * Base Mean LFC Padj Condition
COX7C 101.753584 1.93 0.03584019 FS vs. TX
LOC114116073 un_ncRNA 832.4 −4.60 1.26 × 10−28 FS vs. TX
PAPPA2 24.4 −2.27 0.00091 FS vs. TX
LOC114118704 TVP23(p) 38.8 −2.51 1.70 × 10−6 FS vs. TX
ADAMTS4 892.8 −1.80 0.02409534 FS vs. F1
SHOX2 74.0 1.95 0.0200087 FS vs. F1
HOXD10 99.3 −2.17 0.00279421 FS vs. F1
SCTR 87.9 1.70 0.0146455 FS vs. F1
HOXC11 24.1 −1.81 0.01918401 FS vs. F1
LOC105611004 un_ncRNA 40.9 −2.06 0.00279421 FS vs. F1
LOC114116073 un_ncRNA 832.4 −4.82 5.58 × 10−31 FS vs. F1
LRP11 125.0 −1.84 0.02732988 FS vs. F1
LOC114118704 TVP23(p) 38.8 −1.92 0.00279421 FS vs. F1
BTN1A1 22.4 1.86 0.02926403 FS vs. F1
KCNQ1 857.0 1.77 0.04977007 FS vs. F1
HNR1PA1 81.1 1.93 0.0200087 FS vs. F1
COX7C 101.7 −1.88 0.03094773 TX vs. F1
PCSK5 469.2 1.69 0.01712337 TX vs. F1
SCTR 87.9 1.79 0.00816462 TX vs. F1
HOXC11 24.1 −1.92 0.00816462 TX vs. F1
PPM1H 575.3 1.67 0.00684851 TX vs. F1
HOXA9 74.2 −1.96 0.00816462 TX vs. F1
RDH10 2603.9 1.56 0.00816462 TX vs. F1
CA5A 983.4 −1.50 0.01137482 TX vs. F1

LFC: Log2(Fold Change), Padj: Adjusted p-value.