Table 4.
- | 48 h Storage of Raw Milk | 96 h Storage of Raw Milk | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Milk Type | TMPi | TMPf | ΔTMP | TMPi | TMPf | ΔTMP |
M-SMilk | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.03 ± 0.08 | 0.50 ± 0.04 | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 0.03 ± 0.08 |
T-SMilk | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.04 ± 0.08 | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.08 |
P1-SMilk | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 0.55 ± 0.04 | 0.03 ± 0.08 | 0.57 ± 0.04 | 0.71 ± 0.04 | 0.14 ± 0.08 |
P2-SMilk | 0.48 ± 0.04 | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 0.04 ± 0.08 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 0.54 ± 0.04 | 0.07 ± 0.08 |
For M-SMilk, ∆TMP remained low (0.03 × 105 Pa), regardless of the 4 °C storage duration of raw milk (Table 4). After 4 °C storage for 48 h, heat-treated milks (T-SMilk, P1-SMilk and P2-SMilk) also had low ∆TMP (0.04 × 105 Pa). For T-SMilk, bactofugation had little influence on ∆TMP (results not shown). For pasteurized milks, ∆TMP were similar (0.04 × 105 Pa) for P1-SMilk (low bacteria count, 2.0 g·kg−1 of residual fat) and P2-SMilk (low bacteria count, 0.5 g·kg−1 of residual fat). Conversely, after 4 °C storage for 96 h, TMP increased for heat-treated milks: by 23% for T-SMilk (by 15% when stored for 72 h; results not shown), and by 25% and 15% for P1-SMilk and P2-SMilk, respectively.