Skip to main content
. 2020 May 16;21:88. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01162-5

Table 5.

Responses on understanding terms in EBM (study design terms)

Term Family medicine specialist Family doctor Total P-valuea
Meta-analysis
 It would not be helpful to me to understand 3 (100) 0 (0) 3 (1.3) 0.084
 Don’t understand but would like to 14 (43.8) 18 (56.3) 32 (13.6)
 Basic understanding 79 (61.7) 49 (38.8) 128 (54.2)
 Yes, understand and could explain to others 48 (65.8) 25 (34.2) 73 (30.9)
Randomized controlled clinical trial
 It would not be helpful to me to understand 1 (100) 0 (0) 1 (0.4) 0.077
 Don’t understand but would like to 8 (36.4) 14 (63.6) 22 (9.3)
 Basic understanding 81 (63.8) 46 (36.2) 127 (53.6)
 Yes, understand and could explain to others 55 (63.2) 32 (36.8) 87 (36.7)
Cohort study
 It would not be helpful to me to understand 2 (100) 0 (0) 2 (0.8) 0.007
 Don’t understand but would like to 14 (36.8) 24 (63.2) 38 (16.1)
 Basic understanding 82 (65.6) 43 (34.4) 125 (53)
 Yes, understand and could explain to others 46 (64.8) 25 (35.2) 71 (30.1)
Case control study
 It would not be helpful to me to understand 4 (66.7) 2 (33.3) 6 (2.6) 0.671
 Don’t understand but would like to 42 (56.8) 32 (43.2) 74 (31.5)
 Basic understanding 61 (61) 39 (39) 100 (42.6)
 Yes, understand and could explain to others 37 (67.3) 18 (32.7) 55 (23.4)
Cross-sectional study
 It would not be helpful to me to understand 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3) 3 (1.3) 0.646
 Don’t understand but would like to 29 (53.7) 25 (46.3) 54 (22.8)
 Basic understanding 71 (63.4) 41 (36.6) 112 (47.3)
 Yes, understand and could explain to others 43 (63.2) 25 (36.8) 68 (28.7)
Case report
 It would not be helpful to me to understand 2 (100) 0 (0) 2 (0.8) 0.132
 Don’t understand but would like to 3 (50) 3 (50) 6 (2.5)
 Basic understanding 46 (52.9) 41 (47.1) 87 (36.7)
 Yes, understand and could explain to others 94 (66.2) 48 (33.8) 142 (59.9)

aχ2-test