Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychol Rev. 2019 Sep 11;29(3):357–385. doi: 10.1007/s11065-019-09411-w

Table 3.

Meta-Analysis findings

Meta-analysis
Heterogeneity
Publication bias (Egger’s)
Domain k n (BD:C) Hedges’ g p 95% CI Q df p T T2 I2 t-test p
Behavioural inhibition only 2 74:117 −0.27 0.08 −0.58, 0.03 1.09 1 0.300 0.06 0.00 8%
Decision-making 7 149:453 −1.70 0.002 −2.77, −0.63 115.64 6 <0.001 1.39 1.94 95% 2.57 0.025
Delay discounting 2 62:102 −0.12 0.475 −0.44, 0.20 0.35 1 0.553 0.00 0.00 0%
Expressive language 4 220:224 −0.10 0.313 −0.30, 0.10 3.37 3 0.338 0.07 0.01 11% 0.21 0.426
Immediate memory 11 490:523 0.03 0.731 −0.13, 0.19 16.62 10 0.083 0.17 0.03 40% 0.10 0.461
Inhibition 18 569:660 −0.39 0.026 −0.74, −0.05 144.94 17 <0.001 0.70 0.49 83% 2.50 0.012
Long term memory 9 344:384 −0.04 0.702 −0.27, 0.18 17.67 8 0.024 0.25 0.06 55% 1.58 0.079
Mental flexibility 12 421:455 −0.13 0.289 −0.37, 0.11 33.27 11 <0.001 0.34 0.12 67% 1.17 0.135
Planning 1 14:13 −0.67 0.100 −1.47, 0.13 0.00 0 1.000 0.00 0.00 0%
Processing speed 18 592:671 0.34 0.040 0.02, 0.67 135.93 17 <0.001 0.66 0.44 87% 2.27 0.019
Recent memory 7 316:317 −0.53 0.076 −1.11, 0.06 74.12 6 <0.001 0.75 0.56 92% 2.19 0.040
Receptive language 2 69:85 0.17 0.296 −0.15, 0.48 0.03 1 0.852 0.00 0.00 0%
Recognition of emotions 1 12:12 −1.05 0.013 −1.88, −0.22 0.00 0 1.000 0.00 0.00 0%
Sustained attention 13 385:467 −0.15 0.237 −0.41, 0.10 40.01 12 <0.001 0.38 0.15 70% 1.18 0.131
Visual perceptual 3 78:50 0.05 0.778 −0.30, 0.40 1.79 2 0.409 0.00 0.00 0% 0.67 0.312
Visuoconstructional 4 119:139 0.05 0.753 −0.24, 0.33 4.05 3 0.256 0.15 0.02 26% 0.78 0.258
Working memory 20 724:1035 −0.15 0.082 −0.32, 0.02 48.50 19 <0.001 0.29 0.09 61% 0.72 0.241
Neurocognition 42 1313:1752 −0.26 0.001 −0.42, −0.10 163.72 41 0.00 0.44 0.19 75% 3.04 0.002

k: number of studies; n: pooled sample size; CI: confidence interval; heterogeneity (Q-value, degrees of freedom [df], significance test [p value], standard deviation of true effects [tau; T], variance of true effects [tau2; T2], true/total variance [I2]); BD: binge drinkers; C: comparators

Note. Where there were ≤ 2 studies, Egger’s test of publication bias could not be calculated