Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 27;21(6):695–706. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0753

Table 2. Univariate and Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Biliary Stent Patency in Patients with Malignant Duodenobiliary Obstruction.

Variable Univariate Multivariate
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Age (year) 1.168 0.516–2.645 0.709 NA
 < 63
 ≥ 63
Sex 1.530 0.679–3.445 0.305 NA
 Female
 Male
Underlying malignancy 1.476 0.542–4.021 0.446 NA
 Periampullary cancer*
 Metastatic cancer
Level of extrahepatic biliary obstruction
 Distal CBD
 Proximal CBD 0.531 0.229–3.232 0.241 NA
 Whole CBD 0.382 0.049–2.968 0.357 NA
Type of biliary stent 2.091 0.613–7.137 0.239 NA
 Uncovered
 Covered
Location of distal end of biliary stent 3.788 1.292–11.104 0.015 3.771 1.16–12.28 0.028
 Within duodenal stent
 Beyond duodenal stent
Length of duodenal obstruction (mm) 0.612 0.260–1.438 0.260 NA
 < 57
 ≥ 57
Approach route for duodenal stenting 0.935 0.403–2.166 0.875 NA
 Endoscopy
 Fluoroscopy
Timing of duodenal stenting 0.559 0.238–1.313 0.182 0.990 0.39–2.55 0.986
 Before biliary stenting
 After biliary stenting
Type of duodenal stent 1.724 0.694–4.282 0.241 NA
 Uncovered
 Covered

*Periampullary cancer includes pancreatic cancer, duodenal cancer, ampulla of Vater cancer, gallbladder cancer, and bile duct cancer, Metastatic cancer includes gastric cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and ureter cancer. CBD = common bile duct, CI = confidence interval, HR = hazard ratio, NA = not applicable