Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 31;21(6):756–763. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0789

Table 1. Comparisons and Correlations between Percentages of CT Right Pulmonary Vascular Volumes Quantified with Fixed Attenuation Thresholds and Nuclear Medicine Right Lung Perfusion Percentages.

Fixed Threshold 80 120 160 200 240 280 320* 360* 400* 440 480 520 560 600
CT right pulmonary vascular volume percentage (%) 65.8 ± 13.8 66.1 ± 14.1 66.5 ± 14.5 67.1 ± 14.9 67.6 ± 15.4 67.9 ± 15.9 68.4 ± 16.5 69.3 ± 17.0 70.0 ± 17.2 70.4 ± 16.9 69.6 ± 18.9 68.7 ± 21.0 69.3 ± 24.6 69.8 ± 26.0
p-value of paired t test < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.003 < 0.02 > 0.06 > 0.1 > 0.4 > 0.7 > 0.2 > 0.2 > 0.5 > 0.8 > 0.6 > 0.6
Pearson correlation coefficient 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.90 0.80 0.69 0.63 0.48
Mean absolute difference (%) 5.4 5.3 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.9 5.6 9.1 12.7 17.9 22.1

*Optimal thresholds for CT pulmonary vascular volume ratio showing smallest mean absolute difference (≤ 5.0%), lowest level of statistically significant difference compared to reference values measured by lung perfusion scintigraphy, and highest Pearson correlation coefficient. HU = Hounsfield units