Table 2. Comparisons and Correlations between Percentages of CT Right Pulmonary Vascular Volumes Quantified with Adaptive Attenuation Thresholds and Nuclear Medicine Right Lung Perfusion Percentages.
Adaptive Threshold | PAavg/2.50 | PAavg/2.00 | PAavg/1.75* | PAavg/1.63* | PAavg/1.50* | PAavg/1.25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CT right pulmonary vascular volume percentage (%) | 67.2 ± 14.8 | 68.0 ± 15.3 | 68.7 ± 15.9 | 69.3 ± 16.2 | 69.7 ± 16.6 | 71.1 ± 17.2 |
p-value of paired t test | < 0.03 | > 0.2 | > 0.6 | > 0.8 | > 0.5 | > 0.05 |
Pearson correlation coefficient | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.91 |
Mean absolute difference (%) | 4.9 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 5.0 | 5.5 |
*Optimal thresholds for CT pulmonary vascular volume ratio showing smallest mean absolute difference (≤ 5.0%), lowest level of statistically significant difference compared to reference values measured by lung perfusion scintigraphy, and highest Pearson correlation coefficient; PAavg/2.50 PAavg divided by 2.50, PAavg/2.00 PAavg divided by 2.00, PAavg/1.75 PAavg divided by 1.75, PAavg/1.63 PAavg divided by 1.63, PAavg/1.50 PAavg divided by 1.50, PAavg/1.25 PAavg divided by 1.25. PAavg = average pulmonary artery enhancement