Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 31;21(6):756–763. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0789

Table 2. Comparisons and Correlations between Percentages of CT Right Pulmonary Vascular Volumes Quantified with Adaptive Attenuation Thresholds and Nuclear Medicine Right Lung Perfusion Percentages.

Adaptive Threshold PAavg/2.50 PAavg/2.00 PAavg/1.75* PAavg/1.63* PAavg/1.50* PAavg/1.25
CT right pulmonary vascular volume percentage (%) 67.2 ± 14.8 68.0 ± 15.3 68.7 ± 15.9 69.3 ± 16.2 69.7 ± 16.6 71.1 ± 17.2
p-value of paired t test < 0.03 > 0.2 > 0.6 > 0.8 > 0.5 > 0.05
Pearson correlation coefficient 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Mean absolute difference (%) 4.9 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.5

*Optimal thresholds for CT pulmonary vascular volume ratio showing smallest mean absolute difference (≤ 5.0%), lowest level of statistically significant difference compared to reference values measured by lung perfusion scintigraphy, and highest Pearson correlation coefficient; PAavg/2.50 PAavg divided by 2.50, PAavg/2.00 PAavg divided by 2.00, PAavg/1.75 PAavg divided by 1.75, PAavg/1.63 PAavg divided by 1.63, PAavg/1.50 PAavg divided by 1.50, PAavg/1.25 PAavg divided by 1.25. PAavg = average pulmonary artery enhancement