Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 31;21(6):756–763. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0789

Table 3. Comparisons between Optimal Attenuation Thresholds from This Study and Visually Determined Thresholds from Previous Study (5).

Attenuation Threshold Fixed (320 HU) Fixed (360 HU) Fixed (400 HU) Adaptive (PAavg/1.75) Adaptive (PAavg/1.63) Adaptive (PAavg/1.50) Visually-Determined (120–160 HU) (5)
CT right pulmonary vascular 68.4 ± 16.5 69.3 ± 17.0 70.0 ± 17.2 68.7 ± 15.9 69.3 ± 16.2 69.7 ± 16.6 66.3 ± 14.0
p-value of paired t test > 0.4 > 0.7 > 0.2 > 0.6 > 0.8 > 0.5 0.001
Pearson correlation 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.92
Mean absolute difference (%) 4.7 4.6 4.9 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.2

PAavg/1.75 PAavg divided by 1.75, PAavg/1.63 PAavg divided by 1.63, PAavg/1.50 PAavg divided by 1.50.