Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Econ. 2020 Feb 26;71:102306. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102306

Appendix Table 14:

Effect of macroeconomic conditions on the receipt of formal and informal care, sample with 2+ ADLs

Formal care
Any type (formal or informal) of care
Any formal care Nursing home resident In home formal care Assisted liv. resident Any care Any ADL care Any IADL care
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Sample: age 60–69
Unemployment rate 0.0208* 0.0023 0.0042 0.0160*** −0.0154 −0.0104 −0.0100
(0.0120) (0.0063) (0.0081) (0.0050) (0.0154) (0.0151) (0.0170)
Observations 3372 3374 3372 3374 3374 3374 3374
Mean dependent variable 0.1892 0.0578 0.1047 0.0350 0.7501 0.6183 0.6020

Sample: age 70 and over
Unemployment rate −0.0016 −0.0057 0.0022 0.0029 0.0076 0.0053 0.0043
(0.0056) (0.0061) (0.0062) (0.0053) (0.0048) (0.0063) (0.0063)
Observations 9203 9204 9203 9204 9204 9204 9204
Mean dependent variable 0.4931 0.2702 0.2021 0.0524 0.8752 0.7847 0.7869

Notes: Data from the HRS samples of individuals 60–69 (first panel) and individuals 70 and over (second panel) who have difficulty with two or more ADLs. Each cell reports the coefficient on the state annual unemployment rate from a separate linear probability model. All specifications control for a quadratic in age, gender, education, marital status, race and ethnicity, number of children, share of the state population aged 18–64 and aged 65 and over, state log expenditures on total Medicaid and Medicaid HCBS services for the older population and population with physical disabilities, as well as state, year, and linear time trends by state. Standard errors, clustered by state, are in parentheses.

*

p < 0.10,

**

p < 0.05,

***

p < 0.01