Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Econ. 2020 Feb 26;71:102306. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102306

Appendix Table 2:

Effects of macroeconomic conditions on informal care receipt, alternative definitions of informal care

Baseline definition No restrictions Not nursing home residents Nursing home residents
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Sample: age 60–69
Unemployment rate −0.0076*** −0.0074*** −0.0076*** −.0323
(0.0026) (0.0027) (0.0026) (0.0695)
Observations 52530 52530 52272 258
Mean dependent variable 0.089 0.091 0.0889 0.527

Sample: age 70 and over
Unemployment rate 0.0046** 0.0047** 0.0049** 0.0075
(0.0021) (0.0023) (0.0023) (0.0128)
Observations 62850 62850 59590 3260
Mean dependent variable 0.182 0.217 0.191 0.682

Note: Each cell reports the coefficient on the state annual unemployment rate from a separate linear probability model on informal caregiving using data from the HRS sample. The first column sets informal care to zero for nursing home residents; the second and fourth column relax that restriction. All specifications control for a quadratic in age, gender, education, marital status, race and ethnicity, share of the state population aged 18–64 and aged 65 and over, state log expenditures on total Medicaid and Medicaid HCBS services for the older population and population with physical disabilities, as well as state, year, and linear time trends by state. Standard errors, clustered by state, are in parentheses.

*

p < 0.10,

**

p < 0.05,

***

p < 0.01