Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb;49(2):211–220.

Table 3:

Outcome on the relationship between moral norm and risky driving behavior

No Study Country Sample size Behavioural outcome Results
1. Åberg and Wallén Warner(24) Borlänge, Sweden 250 drivers Self-reported speeding a) r= - 0.39, P < 0.01
2. Elliott and Thomson (20) England, UK 1403 traffic offenders Subsequent speeding behaviour r= - 0.48, P < 0.02
3. Gauld et al (12) Australia 171 young drivers Use of mobile phone while driving r= - 0.52, P < 0.001
4. Moan (6) Norway 1025 random residents Intention not to ride with an intoxicated driver r= 0.33, P < 0.001
5. Moan and Rise (7) Norway 1025 random residents Intention not to drink and drive r= 0.16, P < 0.001
6. Nemme and White (10) Australia 169 young drivers
  • a) Sending texts while driving

  • b) Reading texts while driving

  • a) r= - 0.42, P < 0.001

  • b) r= - 0.42, P < 0.001

7. Tabibi and Pfeffer (11) Iran 699 drivers Intention to comply with traffic rules and regulation r= 0.44, P < 0.001