Table 3:
Outcome on the relationship between moral norm and risky driving behavior
| No | Study | Country | Sample size | Behavioural outcome | Results | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Åberg and Wallén Warner(24) | Borlänge, Sweden | 250 drivers | Self-reported speeding | a) r= - 0.39, P < 0.01 | 
| 2. | Elliott and Thomson (20) | England, UK | 1403 traffic offenders | Subsequent speeding behaviour | r= - 0.48, P < 0.02 | 
| 3. | Gauld et al (12) | Australia | 171 young drivers | Use of mobile phone while driving | r= - 0.52, P < 0.001 | 
| 4. | Moan (6) | Norway | 1025 random residents | Intention not to ride with an intoxicated driver | r= 0.33, P < 0.001 | 
| 5. | Moan and Rise (7) | Norway | 1025 random residents | Intention not to drink and drive | r= 0.16, P < 0.001 | 
| 6. | Nemme and White (10) | Australia | 169 young drivers | 
 | 
 | 
| 7. | Tabibi and Pfeffer (11) | Iran | 699 drivers | Intention to comply with traffic rules and regulation | r= 0.44, P < 0.001 |