Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2020 Feb;49(2):283–293.

Table 4:

Spillover effect decomposition of SDM

*Model variables*	*Direct effect*			*Indirect effect*			*Total effect*
	W₁	W₂	W₃	W₁	W₂	W₃	W₁	W₂	W₃
Heal	0.080^*** (0.026)	0.074^*** (0.025)	0.086^*** (0.025)	0.045 (0.042)	0.098 (0.069)	0.092 (0.079)	0.126^*** (0.039)	0.173^** (0.068)	0.179^** (0.076)
Cap	0.132^*** (0.018)	0.149^*** (0.018)	0.151^*** (0.018)	0.067 (0.044)	0.066 (0.073)	0.055 (0.073)	0.200^*** (0.046)	0.215^*** (0.077)	0.206^*** (0.077)
Con	0.555^*** (0.072)	0.510^*** (0.077)	0.483^*** (0.077)	−0.037 (0.102)	−0.169 (0.141)	−0.119 (0.145)	0.517^*** (0.077)	0.341^*** (0.122)	0.364^*** (0.122)
Exp	0.010 (0.009)	0.011 (0.009)	0.012 (0.009)	0.096^*** (0.018)	0.106^*** (0.029)	0.151^*** (0.032)	0.108^*** (0.019)	0.118^*** (0.030)	0.163^*** (0.032)
Hum	0.028 (0.037)	0.011 (0.037)	0.015 (0.037)	−0.228^** (0.099)	−0.237 (0.172)	−0.331^* (0.189)	−0.199^* (0.103)	−0.226 (0.177)	−0.316 (0.194)
Urb	−0.379^** (0.166)	−0.363^** (0.164)	−0.438^*** (0.163)	−0.833^* (0.434)	0.153 (0.682)	−0.033 (0.654)	−1.212^*** (0.453)	−0.210 (0.711)	−0.472 (0.687)

Notes: numbers in brackets reflect standard error.

^***, ^**, and ^* are significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels