Skip to main content
. 2020 May 13;12:3389–3399. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S246995

Table 4.

Survival Analysis Combined with Clinical Parameter and Methylation

Variability n Univariate Multivariate
HR(95% CI) P value HR(95% CI) P value
Gender
 Male 112 1(Ref.)
 Female 52 1.128(0.659,1.930) 0.661
Age
 >60 96 1(Ref.)
 ≤60 68 1.291(0.781,2.134) 0.320
Smoking
 No 108 1(Ref.)
 Yes 56 1.561(0.947,2.575) 0.081
Lymph node metastasis
 Negative 63 1(Ref.) 1(Ref.)
 Positive 101 5.913(2.815,12.418) 0.00000268 3.188(1.271,7.996) 0.013
Histological differentiation
 Well 69 1(Ref.)
 Poorly 95 0.652(0.387,1.099) 0.109
vascular cancer embolus
 Positive 44 1(Ref.) 1(Ref.)
 Negative 120 1.711(1.025,2.857) 0.040 1.498(0.855,2.624) 0.158
Lauren’s classification
 intestinal-type 96 1(Ref.)
 Diffuse-type 68 0.824(0.495,1.374) 0.459
Growth pattern
 Expanding 57 1(Ref.) 1(Ref.)
 Infiltrative 107 0.555(0.315,0.997) 0.041 2.120(4.386,1.025) 0.043
Invasion depth
 T1/T2 84 1(Ref.)
 T3/T4 80 0.899(0.551,1.468) 0.670
Metastasis
 Negative 98 1(Ref.) 1(Ref.)
 Positive 66 2.096(1.280,3.434) 0.003 1.018(0.504,2.055) 0.960
TNM Stages
 I/II 56 1(Ref.) 1(Ref.)
 III/IV 108 5.657(2.576,12.420) 0.00001571 3.269(1.389,7.696) 0.007
AMR
 ≤0.3 93 1(Ref.) 1(Ref.)
 >0.3 71 1.832(1.118,3.000) 0.016 1.940(1.165,3.230) 0.011
M5
 ≤0.3 81 1(Ref.) 1(Ref.)a
 >0.3 83 2.423(1.371,4.280) 0.002 1.874.(1.099,3.182) 0.021
 M27
 ≤0.3 66 1(Ref.) 1(Ref.)a
 >0.3 98 1.885(1.136,3.130) 0.013 2.441(1.362,4.371) 0.003

Note: aConsider the clinical parameters which effect prognosis, we include smoke, Lymph node metastasis, histological differentiation, growth pattern, vascular cancer embolus, invasion depth, TNM stage, metastasis into the multi-factor COX regression.

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.