Skip to main content
. 2020 May 18;11:2250. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15785-w

Table 2.

Chronometric ages for South Walker Creek sites and their reliability score.

QML1470 Dating method Association Score n Age interpretation Age (ka)
SW9 US-ESR (SCU) Direct (m*) Yes—w A* 5 Age of megafauna fossils within Unit C. 32.5 ± 2.5 (2σ)a
US (UQ) Direct (m) Yes—w A 4 Minimum age of megafauna fossils within Unit C. 24.5 ± 0.1 (2σ)b
US (UOW) Direct (m) Yes—w A 2 Minimum age of megafauna fossils within Unit C. 25.5 ± 0.1 (2σ)b
OSL (AU + GU) Indirect (m) Yes—a, w + b A 19 Age of Unit C, including fossiliferous layer. 41.3 ± 1.9 (1σ)a
OSL + US-ESR (ALL) Both Yes—a, w + b A* + A 24 Combined age of megafauna and deposit. 40.1 ± 1.7 (1σ)a
C14 (charcoal) (ANU) Indirect (B) Yes—w + b B 3 Minimum maximum age of deposit.  > 40–50 kac
SW3 OSL (AU) Indirect (m) Yes—w + b A 5 Age of entire deposit including fossiliferous layer. 47.7 ± 3.2 (1σ)a
SWCC OSL (AU) Indirect (m) Yes—a + w A 2 Age of entire deposit (Units B, C & D), including fossiliferous layers. 58.2 ± 6.1 (1σ)a
SWJ OSL (AU) Indirect (m) Yes—b A 6 Age of Unit B, maximum age of fossiliferous Unit C. 65.6±2.2 (1σ)a

Ratings of dating methods uses established criteria11. All chronometric results, including detailed methods, are provided in the Methods and Supplementary Notes 5–8. m, m*, B, A and A* are categories and ratings defined here11.

a above, b below, w within the fossiliferous layer.

aWeighted mean age and uncertainty.

bOldest age and uncertainty.

cReworked macro-charcoal represents a maximum age for the deposit, however, this material only survived ABA treatment, therefore must be considered a minimum age range. Radiocarbon dates on sediment are not included here as the data is not acceptable according to Rodrigues-Rey11.