Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;72(1):46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.01.004

Table 3.

Comparison of arrhythmia and 24-h Holter status in the 4 study groups.

Variable Status The Study group
p
Fib. –F
Fib. +F
Inv. –F
Inv. +F
Total
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
arrhythmia Yes 98 81.7% 95 89.6% 103 88.0% 99 90.0% 395 87.2% .196
No 22 18.3% 11 10.4% 14 12.0% 11 10.0% 58 12.8%
Total 120 100.0% 106 100.0% 117 100.0% 110 100.0% 453 100.0%
24 h Holter VT 5 22.7% 4 36.4% 6 42.9% 7 63.6% 22 37.9% .014
VF 10 45.5% 6 54.5% 7 50.0% 2 18.2% 25 43.1%
Bradycardia 7 31.8% 1 9.1% 0 .0% 0 .0% 8 13.8%
AF & AFL 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 9.1% 1 1.7%
Av block 2,3 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 7.1% 1 9.1% 2 3.4%
Total 22 100.0% 11 100.0% 14 100.0% 11 100.0% 58 100.0%

AF, atrial fibrillation; f-QRS, fragmented QRS; AFL, atrial flutter; VT, ventricular tachycardia; VF, ventricular fibrillation; (Fib. +F), patients received fibrinolytic therapy with f-QRS; (Fib. –F), patients received fibrinolytic therapy without f-QRS; (Inv. +F), patients received invasive therapy with f-QRS; (Inv. –F), patients received invasive therapy without f-QRS.