Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 5;29(1):168–184. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00047

Table 4.

Correlations among comprehension accuracy and extra reviewing time variables and standardized test scores.

Variable WAB-R
CLQT+
CAT
RCBA-2
Aphasia Quotient Attention Memory Executive Functions Language Visuospatial Skills Nonlinguistic Cognition Linguistic/Aphasia Auditory Comprehension of Sentence Auditory Comprehension of Paragraphs Written Comprehension of Sentences Paragraph Factual
Comprehension accuracy
 Slow .46* .14 .62*** .38 .54** .02 .30 .55** .37 .48* .56** .62***
 Medium .38 .14 .57** .43* .43* .13 .35 .48* .57** .53** .65*** .64***
 Fast .44* .24 .66*** .47* .54** .13 .40* .55** .37 .49* .58** .63***
Extra review time
 Slow –.07 .01 .06 –.25 –.14 –.18 –.13 –.15 –.16 –.10 –.03 –.08
 Medium –.03 –.05 .09 –.19 –.10 –.17 –.13 –.12 –.16 –.04 –.01 .01
 Fast –.02 –.06 .12 –.20 –.07 –.22 –.13 –.08 –.11 .03 .03 .08

Note. WAB-R = Western Aphasia Battery–Revised; CLQT+ = Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test +; CAT = Comprehensive Aphasia Test; RCBA-2 = Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia–Second Edition.

*

p ≤ .05.

**

p ≤ .01.

***

p ≤ .001.