Skip to main content
. 2020 May 16;13(8):100783. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100783

Table 2.

The correlations between NAT10, MN, cGAS, STING, IRF3, HIF1A and clinical features.

NAT10 MN cGAS STING IRF3 HIF1A
Histological grading 0.038* 0.889 0.457 0.209 0.201 0.293
PDC 0.003 0.001+ 0.985 0.287 0.318 0.221
Invasion depth 0.156 0.083 0.486 0.227 0.103 0.616
Lymph node metastasis 0.343 < 0.001* 0.942 0.832 0.152 0.814
Distant metastasis 0.046* 0.559 0.240 0.834 0.043* 0.933
TNM stage 0.260 0.049* 0.671 0.928 0.102 0.811
Duke stage 0.326 0.083 0.560 0.857 0.183 0.962

Note: *P < .05; For correlations between tumor marker and PDC stage, significance was taken as +P ≤ .001