Skip to main content
. 2020 May 15;29:e128. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000402

Table 3.

Clinical trials with the largest effect sizes

Trial Meta ID Diagnosis |ES| Treatments A > B Quality PQRS total Citations # Direct attempts Conceptual attempts
Ayen and Hautzinger (2004) 4, 5 Depression
1.56
CBT > SUP * * 9 0 0
de Jong et al. (1986) 3 Depression, Dysthymia 1.03 CBT > SUP Moderately poor 24 1 0 0
Durham et al. (1994) 1, 6, 9, 10 GAD
0.9
CT > DYN Average 31 101 0 3
Gallagher-Thompson and Steffen (1994) 9, 5 Depression 1.27 CBT > DYN Moderately good 37 126 0 3
Klausner et al. (1998) 2 Depression 1.4 GFT > REM Very poor 18 57 0 1
Latour and Cappeliez (1994) 2 Depression
0.92
CBT > CT Moderately poor 22 16 0 1
Milrod et al. (2007) 6 Anxiety
0.89
DYN > AR Very good 43 147 0 0
Norton (2012) 8 Anxiety, Depression 1.54 TRN > RLX Moderately good 37 72 0 0
Shapiro et al. (1994) 9 Depression
1.44
CBT > DYN Very good 41 268 0 2
Shaw (1977) 4, 5 Depression Very poor 18 200 0 5
1.13 CT > BAT
0.94 BAT > SUP
Shear et al. (2001)a 1, 9, 10 PD
0.8
CBT > EFT Moderately poor 26 38 0 0
Taylor and Marshall (1977) 5 Depression 0.89 CBT > BAT Exceptionally poor 16 0 0 0

CBT, cognitive behaviour therapy; CT, cognitive therapy; DYN, dynamic therapy; REM, reminiscence psychotherapy; EFT, emotion-focused therapy; TRN, transdiagnostic therapy; SUP, supportive therapy; BAT, behavioural activation therapy; RLX, relaxation therapy; GFT, goal-focused therapy; CT, cognitive therapy; AR, applied relaxation, quality ratings were averaged between two independent raters; GAD, generalised anxiety disorder; PD, panic disorder.

a

Manual not available.

*Trial unavailable in English. Quality = item 25 from the PQRS.