Table 1.

Prospective/retrospective studies on diagnostic performance of EUS versus CT for detection of pancreatic malignancy

Study	Year of study	Total no of patients	Sensitivity, EUS versus CT (%)	Specificity, EUS versus CT (%)	Accuracy, EUS versus CT (%)
Du et al17	2017	68	98 vs 73*	NA	NA
Kamata et al18	2014	35	100 vs 56*	100 vs 100	NA
Kitano et al19	2012	277	91 vs 71*	94 vs 92	NA
Sakamoto et al20	2008	156	94 vs 50*	NA	NA
Jemma et al21	2008	42	100 vs 88*	89 vs 83	NA
Kitano et al22	2004	65	95 vs 68*	NA	NA
Agarwal et al23	2004	81	100 vs 75*	NA	94 vs 74*
DeWitt et al9	2004	120	98 vs 86*	NA	NA
Rivadeneira et al24	2003	48	100 vs 68*	75 vs 50*	98 vs 67*
Mertz et al25	2000	35	93 vs 53*	NA	86 vs 49*
Gress et al26	1999	151	100 vs 74	NA	NA
Harrison et al27	1999	19	100 vs 50*	NA	98 vs 63*
Midwinter et al28	1999	48	97 vs 76	NA	NA
Legmann et al29	1998	30	100 vs 92	NA	93 vs 93
Sugiyama et al30	1997	54	96 vs 89*	NA	NA
Howard et al31	1997	21	75 vs 63†	77 vs 100†	76 vs 86†
Melzer et al32	1996	12	100 vs 83	NA	100 vs 76
Nakaizumi et al33	1995	232	94 vs 65*	97 vs 94	96 vs 88*
Marty et al34	1995	37	92 vs 63	NA	NA
Müller et al35	1994	49	94 vs 69†	100 vs 64	96 vs 67
Palazzo et al37	1993	64	96 vs 69†	73 vs 53	91 vs 66*
Yasuda et al38	1993	29	100 vs 72†	NA	Duodenal Invasion: 83 vs 33 Gastric invasion: 79 vs 38
Rösch et al39	1991	102	99 vs 77	100 vs 53	NA

*Statistically significant data.

†Statistics are not available.

EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; NA, not applicable.