Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: Chemosphere. 2019 May 9;230:308–315. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.034

Table 2.

Regression Parameters for Kf vs. Sscl and 1/n vs. Melting Point.

Soil Kf vs. Sscl (power regression) 1/n vs. Melting Point (linear regression)
intercept exponent R2 slope intercept
CA Fresno Atwater loamy sand 2.3734 −0.421 0.87 0.0007 0.5481
FRG Laacher Hof Axxa sandy loam 32.53 −0.336 0.81 0.0009 0.5041
FRG Hoefchen am Hohenseh silt 21.079 −0.333 0.79 0.0005 0.6845
NC Pikeville loamy sand 18.507 −0.167 0.75 −0.0005 1.1234
ND Ostlie East sandy clay loam 111.43 −0.379 0.79 −0.0005 1.0405
NJ Penn silt loam 89.923 −0.502 0.97 0.0007 0.5885
WA Ephrata loamy sand 18.318 −0.381 0.78 −0.0081 5.0037
SWTZ Gartenacker loam/silt loam 80.412 −0.477 0.99 −0.0015 1.4041
ND Roger Myron sandy loam 51.163 −0.312 0.70 −0.0007 1.1279
ND Mutchler sandy (clay) loam 91.721 −0.367 0.92 0.0005 0.6751
ND Horse Camp Bridge silt loam 4.9906 −0.124 0.03 −0.0002 0.9694
FRG Speyer/LUFA2.2 loamy sand 78.719 −0.356 0.75 −0.0027 2.0066
FRG LUFA/Speyer2.1 sand 26.7 −0.287 0.72 −0.0018 1.6124
SWTZ Vetroz silt loam 502.43 −0.877 0.98 0.0006 0.719
SWTZ Les Evouettes silt loam Switz 128.02 −1.092 0.98 0.0012 0.4282
MS Bosket sandy loam 80.248 −0.378 0.93 −0.0001 0.9898
SWTZ lllarsaz humic soil 19471947.8 −0.757 0.97 0.0004 0.82
ND clay loam Don Uglem 250.43 −0.372 0.71 −0.0006 1.0761