Table 5.
Comparison of RF models with two different negative sample selection strategies.
| Negative sample selection strategy | Number of selected negative samples | SN | SP | ACC | MCC | Precision | F1‐measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed strategy | 57,058 | 0.904 | 0.994 | 0.949 | 0.901 | 0.993 | 0.946 |
| 114,116 | 0.919 | 0.999 | 0.972 | 0.938 | 0.997 | 0.956 | |
| 128,220 | 0.923 | 0.999 | 0.975 | 0.943 | 0.997 | 0.959 | |
| 57,058 | 0.887 | 0.907 | 0.897 | 0.794 | 0.905 | 0.896 | |
| FIRE | 114,116 | 0.844 | 0.954 | 0.917 | 0.811 | 0.901 | 0.872 |
| 128,220 | 0.832 | 0.961 | 0.921 | 0.812 | 0.904 | 0.867 | |
| 355,634 | 0.745 | 0.992 | 0.957 | 0.812 | 0.934 | 0.829 |