Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 5;13(5):1026–1036. doi: 10.1111/eva.12918

Table 1.

Summary statistics of the six study species for both the data set with and without kin

  Number of samples Average read number per individual Number of SNPs Hea Hob Average inbreeding coefficient Inbreeding coefficient range Number (percentage) of pairwise kinship comparison ≥ 0.10 Dataset with removal of kin
Number of samples Number of SNPs
Pellorneum malaccense 50 2,947,100 16,614 0.28 0.27 0.027c 0–0.17 23/1,525 (1.5%) 36 16,422
Cyanoderma erythropterum 25 2,728,770 12,733 0.32 0.32 0.013d 0–0.09 8/300 (2.7%) 19 12,537
Turdinus abbotti 18 2,952,598 16,223 0.29 0.28 0.046c 0–0.15 5/153 (3.3%) 14 15,909
Mixornis gularis 51 6,395,537 (8,086,118 in the 100‐bp run; 2,914,931 in the 150‐bp run) 24,914 0.24 0.22 0.063c 0.011–0.22 13/1,275 (1%) 40 24,521
Pycnonotus simplex 23 3,167,172 16,911 0.19 0.17 0.134d 0.065–0.20 1/253 (0.4%) 22 16,796
Pycnonotus plumosus 71 3,802,724 (5,871,214 in the 100‐bp run; 2,866,978 in the 150‐bp run) 16,079 0.16 0.14 0.083d 0.004–0.20 13/2,485 (0.5%) 61 15,638
a

Average expected heterozygosity.

b

Average observed heterozygosity.

c

Triadic likelihood estimator.

d

Dyadic likelihood estimator.