Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;13(5):1037–1054. doi: 10.1111/eva.12919

Table 1.

Sample statistics, diversity, and effective population size estimates

Method Group Code N A H o H e G IS Assignment N e (CIs)
RAD C. artedi ART 60 98.5% 0.246 0.253 0.028 98.3%b 1,834 (1,769–1,906)
C. hoyi HOY 21a 94.8% 0.219 0.273 0.196 92.5%b 1,701 (1,487–1,985)
C. kiyi KIY 25 93.4% 0.217 0.242 0.103 100% 2,126 (1,846–2,506)
C. nigripinnis NIG 6 83.1% 0.213 0.261 0.182
C. zenithicus ZEN 4 76.5% 0.186 0.259 0.279
Microsatellites C. artedi ART 30 70.0% 0.534 0.607 0.121 76.7% 91 (42–6,126)
C. hoyi HOY 21a 65.0% 0.629 0.659 0.046 61.9% 73 (33‐Infinite)
C. kiyi KIY 25 67.0% 0.572 0.631 0.093 72.0% 649 (74‐Infinite)

N is the number of individuals successfully genotyped, A is the percentage of total sampled alleles found in each group, H o/H e is observed/expected heterozygosity, G IS is the inbreeding coefficient, Assignment is the percentage of individuals that were correctly assigned to their population of origin in a leave‐one‐out test, and N e is effective population size calculated using the LDNE method and reported with 95% confidence intervals.

a

Three genotyped hoyi samples are suspected to be misidentified kiyi from the RAD‐based PCA and ADMIXTURE analysis and were removed to prevent bias in estimates of diversity and N e.

b

The one artedi that assigned to HOY and the two hoyi that assigned to KIY appear to be hybrids. Outside of these putative hybrids, assignment to the ART and HOY groups was 100%.