Table 3.
Results of the process evaluation
| Satisfaction | ||
|---|---|---|
| % of happy faces per session N (%) | Knowledge-based sessions a | Skill-based sessions b |
| Lowest thru 75% | 26 (19.8) | 10 (6.7) |
| 76% thru 95% | 59 (45) | 62 (41.6) |
| 96% thru highest | 46 (35.1) | 77 (51.7) |
| Facilitator c | Observer d | |
| Dose Delivered | ||
| Objectives reported to be implemented as planned, extent reaching, N (%) | ||
| 0-25% | 14 (4.4) | |
| 26-50% | 34 (10.7) | 3 (7.5) |
| 51-75% | 71 (22.3) | 11 (27.5) |
| 76 to 100% | 199 (62.6) | 26 (65.0) |
| Dose received | ||
| Percent of sessions rated as, N (%) | ||
| positive and active | 247 (77.9) | 33 (78.6) |
| positive but not active | 15 (4.7) | 4 (9.5) |
| not much enthusiasm | 18 (5.7) | 5 (11.9) |
| Negative | 37 (11.7) | 0 (0) |
| Average active participation rate, % | 76.6 | 92.6 |
a
N = 131: total number of knowledge-based sessions;
b
N = 149: total number of skill-based sessions
c
N = 318: total number of evaluations completed by facilitators;
d
N = 42: total number of evaluations completed by observers