Table 4.
Comparison of visibility and suggested change to current position of waterpipe tobacco graphic health warnings between daily and non-daily waterpipe smokers in Phase III (n=149), in Cairo, Egypt, 2015
| Non-daily waterpipe smokers N=84 N (%) | Daily waterpipe smokers N=65 N (%) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| In your opinion, will waterpipe smokers notice GHW | |||
| Yes | 32 (38.1) | 40 (61.5) | %0.004* |
| No | 52 (61.9) | 25 (38.5) | |
| Will the GHW be more noticed if placed differently | |||
| Yes | 70 (83.3) | 51 (78.5) | |
| No | 14 (16.7) | 14 (21.5) | >0.05 |
| If yes, please indicate where | N=70 | N=51 | |
| Different placement on the pack itself | 29 (41.4) | 18 (35.3) | |
| On the waterpipe device or its accessories | 35 (50) | 29 (56.9) | >0.05 |
| Other (e.g. inside cafés, in public places) | 6 (8.6) | 4 (7.8) |
*
Significant difference after Post hoc analysis using Bonferroni correction.