Skip to main content
. 2020 May 18;18:133. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01555-4

Table 3.

Trends in the redistribution of recruits over time, 2013–2018

Year CCG (primary care and Trust data) CCG (primary care data only) LCRN (primary care and Trust data) LCRN (primary care data only)
All conditions
 2013–2014 46% 39% 9% 18%
 2014–2015 44% 44% 15% 19%
 2015–2016 44% 45% 13% 19%
 2016–2017 45% 42% 14% 18%
 2017–2018 43% 42% 11% 24%
 Trend† −0.60 0.41 0.25 1.00
Mental health
 2013–2014 56% 75% 22% 54%
 2014–2015 59% 72% 21% 46%
 2015–2016 57% 72% 13% 50%
 2016–2017 59% 69% 16% 40%
 2017–2018 56% 53% 13% 31%
 Trend† 0.04 −4.86 −2.22 −5.08
Diabetes
 2013–2014 56% 58% 36% 28%
 2014–2015 55% 67% 25% 47%
 2015–2016 59% 72% 26% 52%
 2016–2017 57% 74% 26% 52%
 2017–2018 60% 74% 27% 62%
 Trend† 1.08 4.04 −1.65 7.13

† Trend parameter represents the linear trend in the redistribution index. All trends are statistically significant (full data are presented in Additional file 1, Appendix 4). Patients can be redistributed from over-recruiting areas to under-recruiting areas and vice versa according to the direction and magnitude of effects. A positive trend indicates that the percentage of recruits needing re-distribution is increasing (i.e. that alignment between recruitment and prevalence is worse)