Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020 Mar 12;59(19):7397–7402. doi: 10.1002/anie.201916530

Table 1.

Optimization of the allylic C-H functionalization reaction[a]

graphic file with name nihms-1558072-t0010.jpg

entry Catalyst Additive Yield[b] d.r. [c] ee[d]

1 Rh2(S-NTTL)4 ---- 72% 3:1 92/84
2 Rh2(S-NTTL)4 HFIP 81% 3:1 96/85
3 Rh2(S-NTTL)4 NFTB 76% 3:1 95/87
4 Rh2(S-PTAD)4 HFIP 53% 2:1 80/77
5 Rh2(R-PTTL)4[e] HFIP 64% 1.5:1 −82/−84
6 Rh2(S-NTTLCl)4 HFIP 77% 3:1 93/86
7 Rh2(S-TPPTTL)4 HFIP <5% nd nd
8 Rh2(S-TCPTAD)4 HFIP 14% 1:1 89/92
[a]

Reaction conditions: 9 (2.0 mmol), 10 (0.5 mmol), [Rh] catalyst (1 mol %), 16–18 h reaction time, additive (2 equiv), LiAlH4 (2 equiv).

[b]

combined isolated yield of 12a and 12a’

[c]

determined by crude NMR

[d]

major/minor diastereomer ee dtermined by chiral HPLC analysis of the isolated products

[e]

observed opposite enantiomers. HFIP= Hexafluoroisopropanol, NFTB = Nonafluoro-tert-butyl alcohol