Table 1.
Optimization of the allylic C-H functionalization reaction[a]
![]() | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | Catalyst | Additive | Yield[b] | d.r. [c] | ee[d] |
| 1 | Rh2(S-NTTL)4 | ---- | 72% | 3:1 | 92/84 |
| 2 | Rh2(S-NTTL)4 | HFIP | 81% | 3:1 | 96/85 |
| 3 | Rh2(S-NTTL)4 | NFTB | 76% | 3:1 | 95/87 |
| 4 | Rh2(S-PTAD)4 | HFIP | 53% | 2:1 | 80/77 |
| 5 | Rh2(R-PTTL)4[e] | HFIP | 64% | 1.5:1 | −82/−84 |
| 6 | Rh2(S-NTTLCl)4 | HFIP | 77% | 3:1 | 93/86 |
| 7 | Rh2(S-TPPTTL)4 | HFIP | <5% | nd | nd |
| 8 | Rh2(S-TCPTAD)4 | HFIP | 14% | 1:1 | 89/92 |
Reaction conditions: 9 (2.0 mmol), 10 (0.5 mmol), [Rh] catalyst (1 mol %), 16–18 h reaction time, additive (2 equiv), LiAlH4 (2 equiv).
combined isolated yield of 12a and 12a’
determined by crude NMR
major/minor diastereomer ee dtermined by chiral HPLC analysis of the isolated products
observed opposite enantiomers. HFIP= Hexafluoroisopropanol, NFTB = Nonafluoro-tert-butyl alcohol
