Skip to main content
. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0233500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233500

Table 2. Effect of treatment regimen on outcome, by initial resistance profile, in 7291 patients.

Programmatically adverse outcome Bacteriologically adverse outcome
Total n % OR [95%CI] Total n % OR [95%CI]
Initially susceptible to RMP and INH
6-month RMP-throughout regimen § 1629 176 10.8 1 1524 71 4.7 1
2(3)EHRZ/6HT 1349 187 13.9 1.3* [1.1,1.7] 1210 48 4.0 0.8 [0.6,1.2]
2SEHRZ/1(2)EHRZ/5EHR 2759 489 17.7 1.8*** [1.5,2.1] 2374 104 4.4 0.9 [0.7,1.3]
Initially resistant to RMP
6-month RMP-throughout regimen § 30 18 60.0 1 26 14 53.8 1
2(3)EHRZ/6HT 20 12 60.0 1 [0.3,3.2] 17 9 52.9 1 [0.3,3.3]
2SEHRZ/1(2)EHRZ/5EHRE 571 402 70.4 1.6 [0.7,3.4] 443 274 61.9 1.4 [0.6,3.1]
RMP susceptible, INH resistant
6-month RMP-throughout regimen § 108 7 6.5 1 105 4 3.8 1
2(3)EHRZ/6HT 102 36 35.3 7.9*** [3.3,18.7] 91 25 27.5 9.6*** [3.2,28.7]
2SEHRZ/1(2)EHRZ/5EHR 723 142 19.6 3.5** [1.6,7.8] 629 48 7.6 2.1 [0.7,5.9]

INH or H: isoniazid; RMP or R: rifampicin; E: ethambutol; S: streptomycin; T: thioacetazone; Z: pyrazinamide; OR: odds ratio

Preceding numbers in regimens are months of treatment; subscript numbers indicate intermittent number of doses of preceding drug per week

Level of significance:

** p<0.01;

*** p<0.001

programmatically adverse: failure, relapse, death or LTFU

bacteriologically adverse: failure or relapse

§ either 2(3)EHRZ/4H3R3, 2(3)EHRZ/4HR, or 2EHRhZ/4HRh