Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 26;66(2):135–143. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoz037

Table 3.

Summary of the PGLS analyses, where species-level body mass values (log body mass in grams) are being predicted by the species-level NDVI values (mean NDVI), at the genus taxonomic level

df b F R 2 adj P
Akodon 31 0.24 0.71 0.000 0.4065
Chaetodipus 10 0.42 1.28 0.025 0.2835
Ctenomys 34 −0.32 0.61 0.000 0.4384
Dipodomys 15 −0.51 0.39 0.000 0.5413
Gerbillus 9 2.72 1.09 0.009 0.3242
Microtus 28 −0.86 3.25 0.072 0.0819
Mus 9 0.03 0.00 0.000 0.9627
Neotoma 13 0.43 2.45 0.094 0.1412
Oecomys 11 −0.15 0.04 0.000 0.8391
Oligoryzomys 11 −0.20 0.53 0.000 0.4815
Oxymycterus 9 −0.40 0.13 0.000 0.7212
Paraxerus 8 −3.45 1.52 0.005 0.2524
Peromyscus 36 0.77 6.24 0.124 0.0171
Phyllotis 10 0.25 0.14 0.000 0.7095
Proechimys 18 0.24 0.65 0.000 0.4302
Pseudomys 17 1.38 2.24 0.064 0.1520
Rattus 24 −0.52 0.65 0.000 0.4272
Reithrodontomys 15 0.62 1.95 0.056 0.1827
Rhipidomys 10 −1.20 2.95 0.150 0.1168
Sciurus 23 −1.11 3.60 0.098 0.0705
Spermophilus 27 0.81 1.55 0.019 0.2234
Tamias 22 0.96 8.95 0.257 0.0067
Thomasomys 22 0.48 1.49 0.021 0.2352

Significant P-values are in bold. Please note, results of taxa with low sample sizes (n < 10 or df < 8) are not shown. See “Materials and Methods” section for more information.

df, degrees of freedom (n − 2); b, coefficient estimate; F, F-statistic; R2adj, adjusted R-squared value.