Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 26;66(2):135–143. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoz037

Table 4.

Selection table of the fits of the GLS models of the association between assemblage-level body mass and assemblage-level NDVI values

  ln L AIC ΔAIC wi
No spatial autocorrelation structure −7504.1 15014.2 13952.2 <0.001
Exponential autocorrelation (Euclidean) −726.9 1463.7 401.7 <0.001
Exponential autocorrelation (haversine) 526.0 1062.0 0.0 0.988
Gaussian autocorrelation (Euclidean) −1046.0 2102.0 1040.0 <0.001
Gaussian autocorrelation (haversine) −962.3 1934.6 872.5 <0.001
Linear autocorrelation (Euclidean) −1832.7 3675.5 2613.5 <0.001
Linear autocorrelation (haversine) −1347.3 2704.7 1642.6 <0.001
Rational quadratics autocorrelation (Euclidean) −808.2 1626.4 564.4 <0.001
Rational quadratics autocorrelation (haversine) −682.2 1374.4 312.3 <0.001
Spherical autocorrelation (Euclidean) −733.2 1476.4 414.3 <0.001
Spherical autocorrelation (haversine) −530.4 1070.8 8.8 0.012

ln L, restricted log-likelihood score; ΔAIC fit relative to the model with the lowest AIC score (italicized). The best-fit model based on ΔAIC and Akaike weights (wi) are denoted in bold. The degrees of freedom (n − 2) for all models is 7,600 (n − 2).