Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Feb 12;107(4):735–737. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1793

Table 1.

Challenges in calibrating RWE against RCTs and measures of differences between the study types.

Emulation differences Measures of emulation difference

Differences in study populations due to:
• Unrecorded physician decision-making in RCT
• Lack of complete patient histories in RWE
• Inconsistent recording of laboratory values in RWE
• Poor recording of patient symptoms in RWE

• Proportion of patients excluded due to each exclusion criterion in RCT vs RWE
• Average available look-back in RWE
• Proportion of patients with labs available in RWE

Differences in treatment strategies due to:
• Placebo control in RCT
• Tight control of medication adherence in RCT
• Tight control of dosing schedule and treatment augmentation in RCT
• Proportion of patients discontinuing before the end of follow-up in RCT vs RWE
• Proportion of patients reaching target dose during follow-up in RCT vs RWE
• Proportion of patients on other therapies during follow-up in RCT vs RWE
• Ordering of labs in RWE for treatment titration

Differences in outcome measurement due to:
• Differing outcome definitions
• Differential surveillance for outcomes
• Differing lengths of follow-up
• Overall outcome risk in RCT vs RWE
• Distributions of combined outcome events attributable to each cause in RCT vs RWE
• Length of follow-up in RCT vs RWE
• Evaluation of proportional hazards
• Side-by-side Kaplan-Meier plots