Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Mar 13;44(7):996–1007. doi: 10.1177/0146167218756031

Table 3.

Experiment 4: Mean Proportions of Errors (SD) as a Function of Action-Target Proportion and Focus

Misses False alarms

Focus

Action Inaction Control Differences Action Inaction Control Differences

Mp (SDp) Mp (SDp) A-I A-C I-C Mp (SDp) Mp (SDp) Mp (SDp) A-I A-C I-C
High action-target proportion .21 (.05) .17 (.03) .21 (.04) .04** 0 −.04* .08 (.04) .09 (.03) .09 (.04) −.01 −.01 0
Low action-target proportion .03 (.03) .25 (.04) .03 (.04) −.22*** 0 .25*** .02 (.02) .04 (.04) .02 (.02) −.02** −.02*** 0
Difference .18*** −.08*** .18*** .06*** .05*** .07***

Overall F Tests
F Action-target proportion 187.31*** η2 = 1.27 141.58*** η2 = 0.96
F Focus 92.73*** η2 = 1.27 4.79** η2 = .07
F interaction 136.54*** η2 = 1.87 3.42* η2 = .05
df action-target proportion 1, 147 1, 147
df focus 2, 146 2, 146
df interaction 2, 146 2, 146
F Tests for Action-Target Proportion effects within Focus Conditions (df = 1, 147)
F within action focus 239.04*** η2 = 1.63 21.57*** η2 = .15
F within inaction focus 105.52*** η2 = .72 14.55*** η2 = .10
F within control focus 252.4*** η2 = 1.72 33.81*** η2 = .23
F Tests for Focus Conditions within Action-Target Proportion Conditions (df = 2, 146)
F within high action-target proportion 3.12* η2 = .04 0.43 η2 = .01
F within low action-target proportion 222.32*** η2 = 3.05 2.31 η2 = .03

Note. Mp: mean proportion of errors over relevant task trials; SD: standard deviation. Trials were 50% go trials and 50% no go trials. Differences were calculated by subtracting the second mean from the first, and stars represent the significance of the contrast.

*:

p < .05. p < .01.

***:

p < .001. η2 = F (k-1)/(n-k)