Table 2.

Network connections that significantly differ between OCD (N = 25) and HC (N = 23) at baseline.

Contrast	Hemis	Labela	Region	BA	Hemis	Labela	Region	BA	t	d	Correctionb
HC > OCD	Left	Default 7	Angular gyrus	BA39	Left	Frontoparietal 9	Rostral MFG	BA10	4.99	1.47	NBS, FDR
	Left	Default 7	Angular gyrus	BA39	Right	Frontoparietal 22	Rostral MFG	BA10	4.90	1.45	NBS, FDR
	Left	Default 7	Angular gyrus	BA39	Right	Auditory15	Posterior Insula	BA42	5.20	1.54	NBS, FDR
	Left	Default 19	Posterior MFG	BA8	Left	VentralAttn 5	IFG triangularis	BA45	4.69	1.38	FDR
	Right	Default 33	MFG	BA8	Left	CinguloOperc 18	IFG opercularis	BA44	4.31	1.27	FDR
	Right	Default 34	SFG	BA9	Right	DorsalAttn 30	Occipitotemporal	BA37	3.90	1.15	FDR
	Left	Visual 15	Medial occipital	BA18	Left	Visual 16	Occipitotemporal	BA37	4.02	1.19	FDR
	Left	Visual 15	Medial occipital	BA18	Right	Visual 29	Occipital	BA19	4.33	1.28	FDR
	Right	Visual 31	Occipitoparietal	BA39	Right	Visual 37	Occipital	BA19	4.10	1.21	FDR
OCD > HC	Right	Putamen	Putamen		Right	Auditory 13	Posterior Insula	BA42	4.49	1.33	FDR

^aThe labels are based on the Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations data set [66]

^bFindings that survive false discovery rate (FDR) and network-based statistics (NBS) correction for multiple comparisons are reported. The first three rows show connections that survived both methods of correction

BA Broadmann Area, FDR false discovery rate, HC healthy controls, Hemis hemisphere, IFG inferior frontal gyrus, MFG middle frontal gyrus, NBS network-based statistics, SFG superior frontal gyrus, OCD obsessive–compulsive disorder