Skip to main content
. 2019 May 16;14(2):362–373. doi: 10.1007/s12105-019-01040-2

Table 3.

Statistical results of WB analysis

Protein name p-value
MSGT vs H PA vs H WT vs H PA vs WT MSGT vs PA MSGT vs WT
ANXA-A1 0.0004 0.0017 ns 0.052 ns 0.0309
SOD1 0.09 0.0110 ns 0.0005 ns 0.0075
CFL1 0.0038 ns 0.0004 0.0602 0.0146 0.0001
CRYAB ns ns <0.0001 0.0032 ns ns
ANXA5 0.0003 0.004 ns 0.0003 0.0121 <0.0001
PPIA 0.0281 ns ns ns 0.0086 0.0022
CAPZA <0.0001 0.0115 0.0232 ns 0.0005 0.0409
CAPZB <0.0001 0.0004 <0.0001 ns ns ns
CAPG <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0187 0.0312 ns 0.0058
IGHG1 ns ns 0.0028 0.0018 ns 0.0056

Mann–Whitney U test for non-normal data of the WB analysis obtained from different comparisons between MSGT, PA and WT groups (Fig. 3). In bold proteins that could discriminate MSGT from the benign tumor groups

Abbreviations: ns not significant; MSGT malignant salivary gland tumor; PA pleomorphic adenoma; WT Warthin’s tumor; H Healthy; ANXA1 annexin A1; SOD1 superoxide dismutase 1; CFL1 cofilin 1; CRYAB alpha-crystallin B chain; ANXA5 annexin A5; PPIA peptidyl-prolyl-cis–trans isomerase A; CAPZA-1 F-actin-capping protein subunit alpha-1; CAPZ-B F-actin-capping protein subunit beta; CAPG macrophage-capping protein; IGHG1 immunoglobulin heavy chain constant gamma 1