Table 4.
Efficiency of standard treatment methods, depending on stage of peritoneal carcinomatosis according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
n | 1-yr survival, % | Median survival in mo | P value | |
P1 | ||||
BSC | 20 | 38.5 | 8.5 | 0.12 |
Palliative chemotherapy | 6 | 33.3 | 6.7 | |
Palliative gastrectomy | 20 | 61.1 | 17 | |
BSC | 20 | 38.5 | 8.5 | 0.71 |
Palliative chemotherapy | 6 | 33.3 | 6.7 | |
BSC | 20 | 38.5 | 8.5 | 0.032 |
Palliative gastrectomy | 20 | 61.1 | 17 | |
Conservative approach of BSC + palliative chemotherapy | 26 | 37.5 | 7.8 | 0.05 |
Palliative gastrectomy | 20 | 61.1 | 17 | |
P2 | ||||
BSC | 23 | 11.7 | 5 | 0.56 |
Palliative chemotherapy | 9 | 22.2 | 8.4 | |
Palliative gastrectomy | 8 | 37.5 | 7.5 | |
P3 | ||||
BSC | 62 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 0.003 |
Palliative chemotherapy | 36 | 7.8 | 5.6 | |
Palliative gastrectomy | 12 | 8.3 | 4.7 | |
BSC | 62 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 0.2 |
Palliative gastrectomy | 12 | 8.3 | 4.7 | |
BSC | 62 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 0.0006 |
Palliative chemotherapy | 36 | 7.8 | 5.6 |
BSC: Best supportive care.